Monday, February 24, 2014
In Defense of Dad Rock
Tuesday, August 11, 2009
On tea bagging, corporate protesters, and faux outrage
Generally speaking, human beings are freaked out by change. Especially a lot of change, all at once. It's unsettling and scary, and people tend to resist it by either clinging to what is familiar or by fearing and deriding the strange new thing. This is true even when the change is needed, even when it may be essential for survival. We like routine, the familiar, the habitual. We don't like to change and grow unless we have to, because it's often painful.
But this isn't about being Racist! with a capital R, it's about people's fear of the unknown (change) rising up as the cultural norm that frames their world view is shifting below their feet. That it's happening at the same time as an economic meltdown turned into a vicious recession, which is coming on the heels of a difficult few years of overextending ourselves in two wars and diminished standing in the world following our misguided response to 9/11, is truly unfortunate, and I think is really the reason for such deep seated emotion being seen.
I really worry about our ability as a nation to keep it together, especially since 1) neither side seems capable of listening to the other, 2) politicians and pundits seem more than willing to stoke populist fears and play on people's worst instincts, 3) most of them are funded by powerful interests who are perfectly happy raking in their profits and will fight (and spend) like hell to maintain the status quo, and 4) our media sources are increasingly parochial and insular - we keep feeding ourselves with only what we want to hear, and demonize and make caricatures of the other side, on nearly every issue. (Bush was a fascist? Obama's a Nazi, or a commie? Sotomayor's a racist? Come on. This sort of language doesn't help, it only makes things worse.) And the sad, frustrating thing is that it seems to be working - the corporate interest noise machine is not just obstructing progress by obfuscating the truth, it's poisoning the well...
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/eric-e-burns/an-open-memo-to-progressi_b_255918.html
I'm glad I'm not President because I don't have a solution, just the knowledge that nations have crumbled under lesser circumstances and there's no guarantee that the
An open letter to opponents of health care reform...at least the stupid ones
I'm confused. How exactly will providing insurance coverage for the 48 million Americans who don't have it deny you your right to see your doctor when and if you wish? I still haven't heard someone rationally explain that or show me where this nefarious plot is spelled out in the proposed bill. This isn't a zero sum game where there are only so many doctor's office appointments to be had and if you don't push me aside you won't get yours. What part of 'if you like your existing insurance you can keep it' aren't you getting here?
And please stop using the Soylent Green, 'the gummint's gonna kill all the old people' argument - it's asinine and inaccurate and entirely unfounded. The power of attorney/living will section of the bill (page 425, I believe) reiterates existing legislation that provides Medicare recipients the funding to seek out counseling once every 5 years to discuss their end of life options, at their discretion. It's not mandatory, it won't force anyone to have to defend themselves in front of a death panel or any other such nonsense. It's an additional, optional benefit to Medicare recipients who may be faced with the difficult decision of whether or not to remain alive on respirators, tubes, etc. This counseling gives them the info to decide in advance which course of action they want, IF they want to take advantage of it. Sort of like deciding to be an organ donor on your driver's license. Nobody's making you do it, it's your choice. People seek out this advice all the time, but up to now many of them have had to pay an attorney out of pocket to get this advice. (Damn lawyers!) So now, it would be a government-funded benefit, see? This is a compassionate and benign measure, not a diabolical plot to kill off the sick and infirm. And to continue to use that as a tactic to scare the ignorant and fearful rather than coming up with a valid argument against reform is disingenuous at best, if not downright sinful. So stop it.
Monday, November 3, 2008
Erection Day!
Holy crap. A whole lotta shit has gone down the past few months. Seems like the world as we know it is crumbling...and there's a lot more trouble to come. Not really sure why either of these guys wants to be president anymore - this has to be the most daunting set of problems facing a new administration since FDR, maybe longer. And it's been the never-ending campaign - so thank God, Election Day is here! Hard to believe it’s finally, nearly, truly almost over. I’ve refrained from posting anything on here the past few months, choosing to vent elsewhere – Huffington Post, shooting the shit with friends, mumbling to myself while watching assorted talking heads on cable.
But now, at long last, the chance to take the one meaningful action that matters – the only thing that matters, really. Vote.
Also choosing to resist obsessing about how many things could go wrong, about the Diebold machines that Rove and Cheney programmed to cheat, about the numerous ways that voter fraud and intimidation may rear its ugly head. Choosing instead to envision just how great it will feel to win, to back the winner, and to know that the long national nightmare of W. is about to mercifully draw to a close. Not sure what I’m more excited to watch tomorrow night – Matthews and Olbermann beside themselves with glee, or the variety of assholes at Fox News trying to intellectually process an Obama victory, perhaps even a landslide/mandate. Probably the latter – exploding heads are always cool.
Tuesday, August 26, 2008
Thoughts on the DNC
I grew up in Arizona, where McCain has been our Senator for many years. I disagreed with him on many issues but I always respected him, and was disappointed he didn't get nominated in 2000. (Still would have voted for Gore, but I would have thought about it.) But that was eight years ago, and something has gone terribly wrong with the man. The John McCain of 2008 is no Maverick. He has cozied up to Bush on nearly every single issue - except climate change, thankfully - and appears to have lost any sense of independent spirit or innovation. He is uninformed, dangerously out of touch for today's technology-based global economy (never uses a computer?!), and often seems confused, tired and bitter. It's sad to see - I can't remember a public figure looking and sounding more tired and worn out, a total retread of a candidate. He simply doesn't have the vision, intelligence, or judgment to lead this country in the 21st century. Obama may have some on-the-job learning to do, but I trust his judgment far more than the empty shell that once was the 'Maverick'.
Along those lines, this post really troubled me. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/chris-kelly/the-mccaine-mutiny_b_121034.html Chris Kelly is normally a scathingly funny writer, but here he pegs the current incarnation of McCain to a T, and it's frightening. Horrifying thought, really, that this guy has a serious shot at the White House - whether it's because the Democrats eventually implode due to Hillary Pumas gone wild, or Obama foolishly veering toward the center and pissing off the base when 80% of the nation thinks we're on the wrong track, or just simple, old school, redneck racist fear of some black Muslim dude with Hussein in his name. God help us...
Monday, June 23, 2008
George Carlin, R.I.P.
Thursday, June 5, 2008
Gun for hire
And since the only people who would ever possibly come across this blog are already aware of my situation, it's probably redundant to mention that I've also spent the last couple months jumping the final hurdles to the bar and am now licensed to practice law in Colorado. (Just in case, there ya go.) So far, the biggest change is one of perception. I've been in between jobs before, but for the first time in my life, I can potentially end it all simply by declaring myself open for business. Just in the last week, I've been approached by a couple friends and acquaintances asking for a little legal advice about this or that, and I'm happy to help out of course. It's only after I've spent the better part of an hour listening to their problems, analyzing their situation and discussing potential courses of action toward a solution, that it occurs to me - I should totally be charging for this! Very strange to think that your time is worth actual cash money (50, 100, 200 bucks an hour?!) and that a conversation you would have had at a bar over a couple beers trying to help a buddy sort out a sticky situation is now an offer of professional consulting services for a fee, to be paid within 30 days by cash, check or credit, thankyouverymuch. Still, it is pretty cool to come home from Kinko's with a stack of business cards that look very much like the real deal. Wait, they ARE the real deal. This is gonna take some getting used to...
So I guess the real question is, have you or someone you know been injured in an auto accident?